Kleefisch was interviewed on Christian radio WVCY January 25 and said the state can't afford to "just be handing out money to anyone. This is a slippery slope. In addition to that, at what point are we going to OK marrying inanimate objects? Can I marry this table, or this, you know, clock? Can we marry dogs? This is ridiculous."
As elections are about to begin, her comments has surfaced again and she is now forced to apologize for not losing valuable votes:
"My comments were meant to relay my concern with redefining marriage," Kleefisch said. "I never intended to sound insensitive, and have the utmost respect for all people. I apologize for my poor choice of words."
Sure... a bad choice of words ....
It's obvious that she believes what she says, and I personally find her excuses ridiculous. What about you?